Case Study:
Forecast Market Potential
Back to Case Studies
Pharmaceutical Company
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research to Inform a Forecast
Problem
Estimation of the potential of an early pipeline product to determine the indications that offered the highest potential commercial value
- Explore unmet needs in the treatment of various types of metastatic breast cancer in the context of a rapidly changing treatment environment
- Determine drivers and barriers to the adoption of a new treatment
- Understand reactions to multiple TPPs and willingness to incorporate the therapies into treatment algorithms
- Identify and explore desired endpoints and the trade-offs physicians make between potential trial endpoints
- Quantify potential uptake of multiple TPPs in specific patient groups
Our Recommended Approach
- Qualitative and quantitative research conducted simultaneously (given timeline restrictions) in the US, EU5 and Japan
- Qualitatively, a mix of in-person and telephone interviews exploring:
- Physician awareness and perceptions of new breast cancer treatments
- How physicians currently treat ER+/PR+, HER2+ and Triple Negative breast cancer and the anticipated treatment algorithms for these patients in 2015
- Perceptions of the TPPs
- Quantitatively, a 60-minute Internet survey captured:
- Market sizing data
- Several self-stated allocations
- Current treatment for each indication
- Anticipated treatment in 2015
- Anticipated treatment with the introduction of a new product
- Trade-offs in clinical trial endpoints and relative importance of those endpoints through a partial profile exercise
- Data points required to run deal-breaker analysis to understand at what level a product would not be considered
Results
- The data from this study, combined with other intelligence, aided the client in determining which indications to pursue and helped inform clinical trial design
- Estimate of future-market patient share for the TPPs
- Understanding of how the clinical trial design may impact uptake
- Understanding of the trade-offs physicians make between key clinical trial endpoints
- Qualitative and quantitative explanation of the rationale for the patient shares and trade-offs